Maxon's AI Clarifications: Do They Address Artist Concerns?

Maxon has recently offered explanations regarding its controversial generative AI tool, sparking intense discussion across the 3D art community.

Artists have raised several critical questions:

• Is this AI functionality integrated directly into ZBrush, or is it a standalone tool?
• Was the AI trained using the creative works of ZBrush users without their explicit consent or proper acknowledgment?
• What is Maxon's long-term vision for AI within its suite of creative applications?

While Maxon has attempted to provide answers, many artists express continued skepticism. There's a strong sentiment that the clarifications have not fully addressed concerns, especially regarding the ethical sourcing of training data and the potential implications for artists' livelihoods.

It's noted that while the initial focus and negative reactions centered on an AI backgrounds feature, more practical and impactful applications like Digital Twins were also part of the discussion. This initial framing seems to have contributed significantly to the widespread backlash.

The conversation around AI in creative tools continues to be a complex one. What are your thoughts on these latest developments?